dude, don't get your knickers in a twist. We're all friends here.

It's not like 'Team CrateKings vs CatasBeats' or some shit man, I promise.
Did you read my last post? And Grime's post?
You keep saying that a nice record sounds "better" than a cd, and I think most people here agree with you. Vinyl sounds better, nicer to listen to, etc etc. We are in agreement on this point.
Probably I should have used the word 'fidelity' earlier. Digital sources have superior FIDELITY than vinyl sources.
But by the way, the music that you hear on a vinyl record can be compressed or not, it's not like compression only happens with digital sources. Compression is a choice the engineer makes regardless of what medium the music's gonna end up on.
I promised myself I would no longer reply to this thread but it seemed like you thought it was Us vs You or something, so I wanted to clarify that we pretty much agree anyways and maybe it's just a difference of terminology.
By the way, Rolling Stone is a sucky magazine. I remember every review I read of every Radiohead album up to about Kid A or Amnesiac was pretty much the same and said this: "Well, it's pretty good but it ain't no U2." WTF? Thank God Radiohead isn't U2. Rolling Stone you are so stupid. Go away.